7 min read

What does No VeriFactu consist of?

What the No VeriFactu modality means, what choosing it implies and why Quipu does not recommend it.

Freelancer working with invoicing software in a coworking space
No VeriFactu increases manual obligations and leaves more compliance responsibility with the taxpayer.

Discover what the No VeriFactu modality is, what choosing it implies, and why we do not recommend it.

Written by Amanda Parera and published originally in Spanish in Quipu's blog.

Original article in Quipu's help center

With the arrival of the Anti-Fraud Law and the new invoice-issuing system, businesses must use software that meets the integrity, preservation and traceability requirements set by the Tax Agency (AEAT).

Within this framework, it is possible to choose between two modalities: VeriFactu and No VeriFactu.

At Quipu, the No VeriFactu modality will not be offered. This means that if you choose that option, you will not be able to issue invoices with Quipu and will only be able to use the tool as management software.

In this article we explain exactly what this modality implies and why we believe it is not the most advisable option.

Read about VeriFactu deadlinesWho is actually outside VeriFactu?

What is the No VeriFactu modality?

The No VeriFactu modality allows the taxpayer to issue invoices without sending them to the Tax Agency automatically in real time.

This implies that:

  • Invoices are generated in software that complies with technical requirements but are not automatically communicated to the AEAT.
  • The taxpayer is responsible for safeguarding, preserving and guaranteeing the integrity of all records.
  • In the event of an inspection or requirement, the user must export and deliver the records to the AEAT in the required format.

Unlike VeriFactu, the AEAT does not receive information immediately, so control is carried out afterwards.

Why does Quipu not offer the No VeriFactu option?

Quipu is committed to a modern, secure invoicing system that minimises risks and administrative burdens in day-to-day operations.

The No VeriFactu modality involves more obligations, more manual work and more risk, which is why Quipu will not incorporate it into its invoicing system.

Those who choose this modality can use Quipu as management software, but they will not be able to issue invoices from the tool.

Drawbacks of choosing No VeriFactu

Below are the main reasons why we consider this option not advisable.

1. Greater administrative burden and full responsibility

  • All responsibility falls on the taxpayer.
  • You must ensure that each record complies with the technical integrity and preservation requirements.
  • You must ensure that the data remain unaltered and stored for four years.
  • You must control the exact time of issuance, with a margin of error of no more than one minute.
  • Any mistake or discrepancy may result in requests or penalties.

With VeriFactu, much of this responsibility is reduced because the AEAT receives the information directly.

2. Increased likelihood of inspections or requirements

  • AEAT sources have confirmed that those who choose the No VeriFactu modality are more likely to receive additional controls.
  • The Tax Agency does not receive data in real time and must verify it manually.
  • If the AEAT detects incomplete information, it must formally request it from the taxpayer.
  • The verification process in this modality is more complex and requires greater supervision.

In contrast, with VeriFactu, the AEAT has automated control and does not need to request that information additionally.

3. Fewer advantages and fewer services from the AEAT

The VeriFactu modality will allow:

  • access to automated assistance services,
  • pre-completed VAT returns,
  • immediate validation by the AEAT, and
  • invoices verifiable by clients through a QR code.

None of this will be available to those who choose No VeriFactu.

4. Lower efficiency and higher risk of errors

The VeriFactu modality automates:

  • the record,
  • the data submission, and
  • invoice validation.

In No VeriFactu, the user must manually check that everything complies with the law, increasing the risk of human error.

In summary

Although both modalities are legal, VeriFactu is clearly the safest, most efficient option with the least risk, and it also offers more advantages and automation.

Therefore:

  • Quipu will operate only with the VeriFactu modality.
  • If you choose No VeriFactu, you will not be able to issue invoices with Quipu, only manage your business from the platform.

The goal is to offer a system that provides peace of mind, automatic compliance and zero complications with the AEAT.

Learn about QuipuSee accounting plans
Related reading

Continue with similar topics.